The Argument from Unwarranted Design


Coined by psychologist Nicholas Humphrey, and also referred to by the same as the Argument from Unnecessary Restrictions, this is a useful means of calling into question some types of supernatural or paranormal fringe claims when a conventional explanation to account for them is not immediately available.

Note that this sort of argument applies equally well to such sorts of claims as Intelligent Design as it does some paranormal research, to note just a couple.

It goes without saying that a hypothesis should explain the data, but just as importantly, it must also conform to them. If the data we obtain for a particular claim is not what we would expect given the hypothesis proposed, then that’s reason to consider the falsehood of the hypothesis, and the attendant claim, to be very likely indeed.

For example, if Professor M, reputed mutant feline telepath, can actually read minds solely using supernormal mental abilities, then it’s valid to ask why she needs face-to-face contact with the subject, why she has to speak with the subject, why she has to be under conditions favorable for reading various sorts of verbal and non-verbal physical cues, why she cannot statistically score above the chance of guessing by a control subject when properly blinded to these things, and finally, why the subject and she must share a common language even under these conditions to find out anything when the information gained is allegedly via memorized sensory imagery and emotions as well as otherwise privately articulated thoughts, etc, etc. If Professor M’s ability is truly paranormal and not simply clever cold-reading trickery, this is not what one would expect.

To sum it up, any hypothesis that is proposed should both explain and comply with the data, and if it makes testable predictions that the data don’t bear out, then we have good cause indeed to question it.

References-
(How To Think About Weird Things: Critical Thinking For A New Age, 4th Edition (pp. 73-74) by Theodore Schick, Jr. & Lewis Vaughn)

About Troy Loy

I seek to learn through this site and others how to better my ability as a person and my skill at using my reason and understanding to best effect. I do fractal artwork as a hobby, and I'm working to develop it to professional levels, though I've a bit to go till I reach that degree of skill! This is a crazy world we're in, but maybe I can do a little, if only that, to make it a bit more sane than it otherwise would be.

Posted on Saturday, 0:28, March 19, 2011, in Logic & Philosophy and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Not bad Troy’O, not bad at all. Raises some interesting questions in a really simple way.

    I like.

    TFIY

    Like

Commenting below. No spam or trolling, or my cats will be angry.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,041 other followers

%d bloggers like this: