Monthly Archives: August 2012

Troythulu’s Gnuz and Lynx Roundup for August 31st, 2012 [Updated]


Good evening. This week there’s not much that’s been going on, save more study and less internet time, so this will be a minimalist post. I’ll be posting blog stat updates for the week with this entry, the 1,833rd published thus far:

  • 1525 comments posted,
  • 173 WordPress and Email subscribers…Thank all of you for your keen-eyed peerings and steely gazes,
  • 1712 Twitter fellowers (much better than “followers”…),
  • …and 111,176 page views as of this writing.

This week on the Call was posted:

…Should I Believe?

Dr. Karen Stollznow — “Talking to Tomorrow” TAM 2012

Largest Sky Map Revealed: An Animated Flight Through The Cosmos

Fractals of the Midweek: The Machinafex

Pure Reason…

The Future of the Creationism and Evolution Controversy — Dr. Eugenie Scott TAM 2012

…and posted only hours ago,

How To Argue: A Sample Argument Evaluation

Elsewhere, there was posted,

The Threat of Monkey-Faced Jesus (It’s not what you may think.)

Bill Nye: Creationism is not Appropriate for Children

Tampa is Safe Due to Christian Prayer. God Screws New Orleans. Again.

Donations Needed to Fight Witchcraft Accusations in Africa

Hijacked, Robbed and Spit on…Again.

Gettin’ It On The One

ESP course taught kids how to cheat, parents claim

Hand of Jesus appears just in time for End Times

Well drillers still doing the water-witching thing

New so-called “based on a true story” horror movie about a demon-box hits theaters this fall

It will be a short list of uninfluential scientists: Creationists plan Creation Science Hall of Fame

Two Alien Planets with Twin Suns Like “Star Wars” Tatooine

Book Review: ‘The Scope of Skepticism’

Richard Dawkins Interviews Ted Haggard

“The Future of the Creationism and Evolution Controversy” – Dr. Eugenie Scott – TAM 2012


Pure Reason…


I wish I knew who to attribute the above quote to.

Pure reason gets us nowhere without input to process, and input without processing is useless, a “blooming, buzzing confusion,” that requires we make sense of it to do anything with it.

We must depend for most of our learning on input of some sort, and a means of processing that input reliably and effectively. Reason, thinking our way from premises to conclusion, must work together with sense data, both firsthand and secondhand to do it’s work.

Over at Left Hemispheres, Steve wrote a good piece on religious logic, how it can be and often is internally consistent, but how it’s the premises, not the logic which are often at fault.

The problem for much of the reasoning I encounter is that the premises used in arguments often presume facts simply not in evidence, so no matter how valid the logic, the argument doesn’t even get onto the proverbial airfield, much less actually fly.

I notice this a lot in pseudo-scientific arguments, or religious apologetics, on those occasions when the speaker is actually minding the quality of his reasoning, only to use as premises assumptions and factoids that are just not the case or even if true, don’t support his or her position.

…After all, arguing from false premises even when sincere is still deceptive when simple ignorance is not at play, as the deception is carried out on both oneself and others, and using falsehoods on purpose is willfully dishonest and deserves to be called out.

Actually, all should be called out, error and willful or pious fraud.

When sound argument, not just valid argument is the goal, facts matter…

…and they’d better be demonstrable, too.

Fractals of the Midweek: The Machinafex


All images in this post are original works by the author, generated via Mandelbulber using customized parameter settings and are copyright 2012 Troy Loy

Largest Sky Map Revealed: An Animated Flight Through the Cosmos


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,955 other followers

%d bloggers like this: