A Parliamentary UFO Conspiracy Theory

(This has been rewritten and reposted from 2010/08/02)

Here’s something from a short while ago:

Yet another UFO enthusiast, this time an Italian politician, and one already with a reputation as an extremist, allegedly in connection with a previous conviction in 2005, and he’s claiming that the European Union, indeed, national governments around the world, are not being up-front about classified documentation on UFOs, and demands that they should immediately declassify and release this data, which he seems to think is being wrongly concealed.

My thought is that even if this data exists, that it’s either too trivial to be worthy of serious investigation or too ambiguous to draw any conclusions from further inquiries into it.

He’s basing his claims and demands, this time not on his own experience, as is often the case with claims like this, but upon the anecdotal testimony of others — ‘highly credible witnesses,’ he asserts — and just a wee bit too uncritically to my eye.

He’s already written a declaration of disclosure, which some in the EU parliament have apparently signed onto, and seems to be taking this as agreement with his views.

This is becoming increasingly common for me to come across:

There are typically two general types of proponents of these claims — either that confirmation of their claims, and the imminent revelation of the Truthâ„¢ (of UFOs or anything else) by some (fill-in-the-blank) governmental authority is ‘soon to be released’ or those who upon noting the delay in or apparent lack of such revelation, demand that it must be produced when it fails to materialize on a schedule to their liking.

They’ve been claiming this about the ‘secret’ of UFOs for six decades now…

Both of these views involve a lot of conspiratorial thinking, and this is typical of the pseudosciences, whether it’s of UFOs or some other sort of claim.

This reminds me of the right-wing extremists in the U.S. who subscribe to the whole Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, who even after being presented with a legitimately certified copy of a birth certificate, no matter how many times, are never satisfied and who move the goal-posts ever further back.

Feh…Madness..!

Advertisements

One thought on “A Parliamentary UFO Conspiracy Theory

  1. I think “enthusiasts” is a good word to distinguish 1) the nuts-and-bolts materialists who think the government is holding back physical evidence and documentation of past investigations and 2) the nuts.
    The first group has gotten burned by eyewitness testimony over the decades and learned their lesson; they can be believers and critical thinkers. The second group tends to embrace all conspiracies, such as linking aliens with the JFK assassination, Nazi technology, demons and angels, etc.
    I use “enthusiast” as a pejorative (borrowed from religious discussion), leaving “believer” as a more neutral term.

    Like

Commenting below. No spam or trolling, or my cats will be angry.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s